Competences can be divided into three types:
You acquire the general academic competencies when you work with different academic challenges and tools. In your study, it is often not the product you are judged on, but rather whether you are able to critically relate to and reflect on the process you have been through. Including how you have specifically approached challenges towards the product.
What are your general academic competencies?
With your education, you achieve the following general academic competencies:
- be able to delimit, define and analyze an academic problem using relevant academic theories and methods
- be able to systematize complex knowledge and data as well as select and prioritize matters that are significant to the topic
- be able to critically evaluate the various theories and methods of the subject
- have a precise and consistent application of concepts and be able to engage in dialogue and argue on a basic theoretical basis
- take a critical stand on sources and document them
- convey professional issues and solution models so that it becomes relevant and understandable for different target groups
- be able to handle complex and development-oriented situations and enter into a collaboration, including being able to receive and give constructive criticism
- be able to work independently, disciplined, structured and purposeful, including also being able to meet deadlines and formalities
You can read more about your general academic competencies in your curriculum.
The subject-specific competence objectives relate to the programme’s academic core competences and are divided into knowledge, skills and competences according to the “New Danish qualifications framework for higher education”.
Knowledge and Understanding
- must possess knowledge of one or more subject areas which, in selected fields, is based on the highest international research within tourism studies
- must be able to understand and, on a scientific basis, critically reflect on the knowledge of the subject area(s) as well as to identify scientific issues
- must be able to delimit and define a research or project task at a high scientific level within the field of tourism studies.
Graduates must be able to:
- master the scientific methodologies and tools relevant to tourism studies
- master general skills related to work within tourism and related areas
- use Participatory Inquiry as an inquiry based learning process that interweaves Knowing, Doing, Making and Relating and leverages the participatory nature of communicative interaction between people.
Graduates must be able to:
- manage work situations and developments that are complex, unpredictable, and require innovative models or solutions
- enter into collaborative partnerships in different leaning environments, including being able to accept criticism of their own work, give constructive criticism to others and assume professional responsibility
- independently take responsibility for his/hers own professional development, learning and specialisation in the field of tourism
- pursue an inquiry by moving from experiment to experiment as they open up and explore a range of perspectives on that inquiry.
Your personal competences thus describe your qualities as a person, which has a great influence on how you carry out your work and how you collaborate with others.
It is a good idea to practice putting your personal skills into words. Once you are clarified, you are more attractive to a potential employer. You can better present yourself and assess whether a type of job or workplace is right for you.
Employers are often also at least as interested in hearing about who you are and what motivates you as what you have read.
What are your personal competences?
You can consider how you typically approach a task and approach collaboration as it will tell something about your personal competences. Try to do the following exercise concretely:
Think back to the last time you participated in a project work:
- How did you approach the process from the start?
- What went well?
- What went less well?
- What personal competencies in you were the reason for the things that went well?